Everything about Mad Pain And Martian Pain totally explained
Mad Pain and Martian Pain is a philosophical article written by
David Kellogg Lewis. Lewis argues that a theory of pain must be able to reflect the most basic intuitions of both
functionalism and
identity theory. As such, he proposes the existence of two beings both in
pain - one whose physical explanation of pain differs from ours and one whose reaction to pain differs from ours. Lewis states that any complete theory of the mind should be able to explain how each being is in pain.
Lewis's two forms of pain
The being with "mad pain" is human like us. The primary difference is that when his brain is in the same state we're in when we experience pain, his mind turns to
mathematics and he begins to snap his fingers. He isn't at all inclined to prevent the pain from occurring. Lewis ultimately goes on to explain that pain is relative to a species, implying that the man who exhibits mad pain is essentially an exception. He is in pain because, instantiated in him, is that physical state which is normally an instantiation of pain in his (our) species. In Lewis' words, "In short, he feels pain but his pain doesn't at all occupy the typical causal role of pain."
A being with "Martian pain" isn't human but, when subject to pain, will react in the same way that we do. He is strongly inclined to prevent whatever stimulus is causing discomfort. However, the physical explanation of Martian pain is different from that of human pain. He has a "hydraulic mind" and pain causes inflation of cavities in his feet. Lewis suggests that the Martian is indeed in pain, because, instantiated in him is the filler of the relevant functional role for pain in that species: inflation of the cavities in the feet. In Lewis' words, "In short, he feels pain but lacks the bodily states that either are in pain or else accompany it in us."
Postscript
In a postscript to
Mad Pain and Martian Pain (published in
Philosophical Papers, Volume I), Lewis takes a critical view of
qualia. He explicitly identifies pain with qualia, observing that, "We say to the friend of qualia that, beneath his tendentious jargon, he's just talking pain and various aspects of its functional role." (p. 130). He then lays out a response to the
knowledge argument of
Frank Jackson.
Objections
Further Information
Get more info on 'Mad Pain And Martian Pain'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://mad_pain_and_martian_pain.totallyexplained.com">Mad pain and Martian pain Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
